|
Aquarian
Weekly 4/7/10
REALITY CHECK
READERS RESPONSES
Comments on Health Care Reform are still pouring in from all
quarters. Below is a sample.
Don't
know how much you've clarified ... as the lies you want to "debunk"
aren't debunked with facts but with your opinion. (TEN
LIES ABOUT HEALTH CARE REFORM - Issue: 3/31/10) As for
"This is actually fiscally responsible legislation" and your reply:
"Not in the least," you run afoul of Paul Krugman, who states
this is indeed fiscally responsible legislation. Since Krugman
is no big fan of Obama or the Democrats (though he likes Republicans
less) and since he's won a "Nobel" for economics (it's not really
a NObel, but let's let that lie for now) & he's no dummy, I have
to go with Paul on this one.
Everyone
should read his "Three Myths about Health Care Reform" ... including
"this is fiscally irresponsible".
It
is a reasonable, responsible plan. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
Vincent
Czyz
Thank
you, Mr. Campion!
I
breathed a great sigh of relief after inhaling a few paragraphs
of this week's Reality Check. The polarized shitstorm that is
cable news will admit no middle ground.
I
did enjoy President Obama's statement at the "feel good" rally
in Sometown, USA where he said (paraphrasing liberally) that 'the
conservatives said great cracks would open up in the earth ...turns
out to be a pretty nice day! Birds are singing, people walking
down the mall hand in hand."
Indeed,
his statement foreshadows the future of health care...Business
as Usual! Fat Cats getting fatter, Middle Class getting bullshitted
ad nauseum. This legislation did crack the tough shell of the
health care coconut and I think there is much to like in the new
legislation, as well as much to sneer at.
Keep
it coming!
Jonathan
Young
N. Kingstown RI
You
forgot "This is of the people, by the people, and for the people."
Whether "the American people demand it," the implementation is
very clearly an agreement between the Congress and the health
care insurance corporations. The glaring and obvious clue is that
the pre-existing conditions clause doesn't take effect until 2014.
I parse that as, "We need enough time to buy legislation to have
that part repealed."
What's
missing, I think, is reform of the other aspects of health care,
e.g., providers charging whatever the market will bear, per each
insurer's market share. The history of health care in these United
States reveals growth most resembling a yeast culture: Unstructured,
following the path of most profit, and completely without conscious
consideration of the impacts of the growth.
It's
abundantly clear that We the People are not the customers, merely
the consumers.
Brad
Morrison
GW
Bush's "massive prescription drug overhaul" wound up costing me
$60 for a GENERIC drug that used to cost $12.00...so much for
Republicans' efforts.
Paula
di Napoli
I
woke up today to a big surprise. I was expecting Armageddon. I
called my doctor's office and he was still there taking appointment.
My insurance company was still trying to raise my rates, the pharmacy
was still open and hadn't been taken over by bureaucrats, the
Catholic hospital was still operating with nuns scurrying about.
In fact I couldn't tell the difference between the day before
health care passed and today.
Now
I've been told that the federal government was going to sweep
in, round up all the doctors and make them work out of a big government
building, that private hospitals were going to be shut down, that
pharmacies were going to close and be moved to the big government
building. That all those private doctors, nurses and pharmacists
were going to become federal employees…you know…the takeover of
our entire health care system
Oh
well, I'll give my doctor a call next week and see. Maybe it will
take a few days before he has to report to the government health
care center.
Armageddon
is starting to look like just another day.
Norris
Hall
From
the AP (hardly a right-wing mouthpiece) a week ago - "The new
healthcare legislation will take us from 83% of the country covered
to about 95%..." So we're about to drop a trillion (and that number
is a joke because the Dems purposely left out the doc fix and
double counted Medicare savings to keep the price tag low, and
the CBO only works off of the numbers they're given whether they're
fantasy or not) for 12 measly percentage points? A trillion for
12. Wow what a bargain. I guess the Dems used that new math they
touted but that has put U.S. educational performance behind some
Slavic village somewhere out in the great Russian wasteland.
The
anger all this engenders is deep-seated. It's not as shallow as
the Dems classic of Repubs wanting to leave children and the elderly
out in the street to die "quickly." Come November with a still
lame and getting lamer economy, high unemployment, everyone feeling
more than a pinch in the wallet, and a ruling party racking up
a trillion (more like 2) on our credit card as if it were the
roaring 20's, there will be payback. And that's not even factoring
in the new low the Dems set in getting reform passed. I'm surprised
they didn't dig up Teddy Kennedy for an aye vote.
Ken
Eustace
We
are under siege from a corrupt and leftist leaning government
that seemingly sees no limit to it's power and desecrates the
Constitution and everything the founders stood for…but take heart…the
founders knew such a thing could happen and there are still several
roadblocks that could derail the Obama Express to Socialism or
worse…like the courts and state governments…the latter are just
waking up now to the fact that Obama is their enemy and is encroaching
on their sovereignty in a manner that could eventually lead to
the dissolution of state governments concentrating all power and
gov't revenues in Washington. We are not there yet, even if the
courts fail us, the states have vested interests to resist being
overtaken by Washington.
JL
What
I find most dismaying is that no one can see the simple truth
now facing each and every American - our Republic and the values
we stand for have been fundamentally undermined. The unconstitutionality
of this bill is clear for anyone looking at it with any degree
of objectivity - the wealthy will be punished for being wealthy
- in the form of higher taxes to pay for the care of those who
can not pay. It is a central tenet of Socialism and Marxism that
those who have wealth must surrender it to those who do not. Every
Marxist for Mao Tze Tong, to Fidel Castro, and now, sadly, our
president, has sought to begin the "Socialization" of society
by taking over health care. Our men and women in uniform spent
the better part of the last century keeping the spread of communism
in check - I know I don't have to explain this to my elders -
they lived through it. What the hell were they fighting for?
The
Monkey King
Considering
how overwhelmingly in control wealth and corporate interests already
are of the political and legal process, it is just silly to argue
that government somehow is now establishing draconian and on-the-way-to-dictatorial
control with this bill. What little they will actually control
in between all the loopholes and provisions for ineffective regulation,
will undoubtedly disappear thanks to inevitable outsourcing to
and lobbying by the same companies who would supposedly now be
held in check.
If
Obama really wanted to, he could simply have followed all the
precedents set by the previous administration in abusing executive
power. Instead, he gave speeches for a year while Democrats in
senate and congress waffled & failed to rally around anything.
Then finally they lost a crucial seat in the senate, and pushed
through on a bill that will in all likelihood not reduce the continued
profit growth of the industries that are driving the ever-higher
costs of health services in the first place.
Far
too much media attention has distorted the view as to what this
health reform bill means to the American public and who is for
or against it. The reality is that it is a mixed bag for many
people, but that it is a first step toward the government promoting
the health of its citizens. The first implementation of the bill
will have some problems, but because it exists and touches so
many areas, the amendments will continue to make it more effective.
Were the law not passed, there would not be the same government
involvement to try to fix the system
Wellescent
Health Blog
Reality
Check | Pop Culture | Politics
| Sports | Music
|